Expert System (AI) is transforming education while making learning more available but likewise triggering arguments on its impact.

While students hail AI tools like ChatGPT for boosting their knowing experience, lecturers are raising issues about the growing dependence on AI, which they argue fosters laziness and undermines academic integrity, specifically with many students not able to protect their projects or given works.

Prof. Isaac Nwaogwugwu, a lecturer at the University of Lagos, in an interview with Nairametrics, revealed aggravation over the growing reliance on AI-generated responses amongst trainees recounting a recent experience he had.

RelatedStories

Avoid sharing personal details that can recognize you with AI tools- Expert cautions

Chinese AI app DeepSeek sparks global tech selloff, challenges U.S. AI dominance

"I gave a project to my MBA trainees, and out of over 100 trainees, about 40% sent the precise same answers. These students did not even know each other, but they all used the very same AI tool to create their actions," he stated.

He noted that this pattern prevails among both undergraduate and postgraduate trainees however is specifically worrying in part-time and distance knowing programs.

"AI is a serious obstacle when it concerns tasks. Many students no longer believe critically-they simply go online, produce answers, and submit," he included.

Surprisingly, some speakers are also implicated of over-relying on AI, setting a cycle where both teachers and students turn to AI for benefit instead of intellectual rigor.

This argument raises critical questions about the role of AI in scholastic integrity and trainee advancement.

According to a UNESCO report, while ChatGPT reached 100 million regular monthly active users in January 2023, just one country had released policies on generative AI since July 2023.

As of December 2024, ChatGPT had more than 300 million people using the AI chatbot each week and 1 billion messages sent every day worldwide.

Decline of scholastic rigor

University lecturers are significantly worried about trainees sending AI-generated tasks without genuinely understanding the content.

Dr. Felix Echekoba, a lecturer at Nnamdi Azikiwe University, expressed his concerns to Nairametrics about trainees progressively depending on ChatGPT, only to battle with responding to fundamental questions when checked.

"Many students copy from ChatGPT and send refined projects, but when asked fundamental concerns, they go blank. It's disappointing since education is about finding out, not just passing courses," he said.

- Prof. Nwaogwugwu explained that the increasing number of first-class graduates can not be completely credited to AI however admitted that even high-performing students utilize these tools.


"A first-rate trainee is a first-class trainee, AI or not, however that doesn't mean they do not cheat. The benefits of AI may be peripheral, however it is making trainees dependent and less analytical," he stated.

- Another speaker, wiki.rrtn.org Dr. Ereke, from Ebonyi State University, raised a different issue that some speakers themselves are guilty of the same practice.


"It's not just trainees utilizing AI lazily. Some speakers, out of their own laziness, produce lesson notes, course lays out, marking schemes, and even test questions with AI without examining them. Students in turn use AI to generate answers. It's a cycle of laziness and it is eliminating real knowing," he regreted.

Students' point of views on usage

Students, on the other hand, say AI has enhanced their learning experience by making academic products more reasonable and accessible.

- Eniola Arowosafe, a 300-level Business Administration trainee at Unilag, shared how AI has considerably aided her learning by breaking down complex terms and providing summaries of prolonged texts.


"AI helped me comprehend things more quickly, especially when dealing with complicated subjects," she discussed.

However, she remembered an instance when she used AI to send her project, just for her speaker to instantly acknowledge that it was generated by ChatGPT and decline it. Eniola kept in mind that it was a good-bad effect.

- Bryan Okwuba, who recently graduated with a top-notch degree in Pharmacy Technology from the University of Lagos, securely believes that his scholastic success wasn't due to any AI tool. He attributes his outstanding grades to actively interesting by asking questions and akropolistravel.com focusing on locations that speakers stress in class, as they are typically reflected in examination questions.


"It's everything about existing, taking note, and tapping into the wealth of understanding shared by my coworkers," he said,

- Tunde Awoshita, a final-year marketing student at UNIZIK, systemcheck-wiki.de admits to occasionally copying straight from ChatGPT when dealing with numerous deadlines.


"To be sincere, there are times I copy straight from ChatGPT when I have numerous deadlines, and I know I'm guilty of that, most times the speakers don't get to read through them, however AI has actually likewise assisted me learn faster."

Balancing AI's function in education

Experts believe the solution depends on AI literacy; mentor trainees and forum.pinoo.com.tr speakers how to use AI as a knowing help instead of a faster way.

- Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, highlighted the integration of AI into Nigeria's education system, stressing the value of a well balanced technique that keeps human involvement while utilizing AI to improve learning results.


"As we navigate the quickly progressing landscape of Artificial Intelligence (AI), it is vital that we prioritise human company in education. We need to ensure that AI enhances, instead of changes, educators' important role in forming young minds," he stated

Concerns over AI in Learning

Dorcas Akintade, a cybersecurity improvement professional, addressed growing concerns concerning using expert system (AI) tools such as ChatGPT and their potential threats to the instructional system.

- She acknowledged the benefits of AI, nevertheless, highlighted the requirement for caution in its use.

- Akintade highlighted the increasing resistance amongst educators and schools towards including AI tools in discovering environments. She identified 2 main reasons AI tools are dissuaded in educational settings: security risks and plagiarism. She discussed that AI tools like ChatGPT are trained to respond based on user interactions, which may not line up with the expectations of teachers.


"It is not taking a look at it as a tutor," Akintade said, discussing that AI does not accommodate particular teaching approaches.

Plagiarism is another problem, as AI pulls from existing data, often without correct attribution

"A lot of people require to comprehend, like I stated, this is information that has actually been trained on. It is not simply bringing things out from the sky. It's bringing information that some other individuals are fed into it, which in essence indicates that is another person's documents," she cautioned.

- Additionally, Akintade highlighted an early concern in AI development called "hallucination," where AI tools would generate details that was not accurate.


"Hallucination indicated that it was bringing out details from the air. If ChatGPT might not get that information from you, it was going to make one up," she discussed.

She suggested "grounding" AI by offering it with particular information to prevent such errors.

Navigating AI in Education

Akintade argued that banning AI tools outright is not the option, particularly when AI presents a chance to leapfrog conventional instructional methods.

- She thinks that regularly strengthening essential info helps individuals remember and classicrock.awardspace.biz avoid making mistakes when confronted with difficulties.


"Immersion brings conversion. When you inform people the very same thing over and over again, when they are about to make the errors, then they'll keep in mind."

She also empasized the requirement for forum.altaycoins.com clear policies and treatments within schools, keeping in mind that lots of schools must address the individuals and procedure elements of this usage.

- Prof. Nwaogwugwu has turned to in-class projects and tests to counter AI-driven academic dishonesty.


"Now, I primarily use assignments to guarantee trainees offer original work." However, he acknowledged that handling big classes makes this method hard.

"If you set complex concerns, students will not be able to use AI to get direct responses," he described.

He stressed the need for universities to train speakers on crafting examination questions that AI can not quickly fix while acknowledging that some lecturers struggle to counter AI misuse due to an absence of technological awareness. "Some speakers are analogue," he stated.

- Nigeria released a draft National AI Strategy in August 2024, focusing on ethical AI advancement with fairness, openness, accountability, and personal privacy at its core.

- UNESCO in a report calls for the regulation of AI in education, encouraging organizations to examine algorithms, data, and outputs of generative AI tools to ensure they fulfill ethical requirements, safeguard user data, and filter inappropriate content.

- It worries the need to assess the long-term impact of AI on important skills like believing and imagination while producing policies that align with ethical structures. Additionally, UNESCO advises implementing age constraints for GenAI usage to secure more youthful trainees and secure susceptible groups.
- For governments, it encouraged embracing a collaborated nationwide technique to regulating GenAI, including establishing oversight bodies and aligning guidelines with existing information defense and personal privacy laws. It stresses examining AI threats, implementing more stringent guidelines for high-risk applications, and making sure national data ownership.